Are Small Businesses Becoming Too Dependent on Grants?

Every startup owner clearly understands the classic rule of survival. You build something and sell it to your customers, Then you have to meet your expenses and live up to trade another day. And customer revenue hasn’t been merely a metric on a spreadsheet. You’d say it is the perfect signal showcasing that your business has a right to exist.

But things seem to be taking a different direction in the last couple of years. Actually, there has been a tremendous shift across global entrepreneurship ecosystems. Capital is now easily accessible at the early stage than ever before. And this is mostly due to the explosion of innovation grants, government subsidies, and corporate pitch competitions.

This has also come with a few drawbacks. After all, most people are now focusing on winning grants rather than getting paying customers. There’s no arguing that grants are important for early-stage experimentation. But startups risk setting up themselves for long-term failure once the subsidies cease.

Small Business Ecosystem Rewards Grant Dependency

You can never setup a startup with the goal of building a grant-dependent business. Instead, you need to adapt to what your local business ecosystem rewards. You’ll naturally follow the money if you consistently celebrate funding announcements over unglamorous profitability.

That’s not to say grants are the enemy. On the contrary, non-dilutive capital offers and important service to the economy. After all, they help fund high-risk research and development.

Recommended for You:

• What Is a Dividend and How Does It Work?
• Why Business Owners Must Design Their Lives, Not Divide Them
• How Data Analytics Improves Business Decisions

The problem arises when grants become the traction rather than the runway to reach traction. You can say that grants only serve to buy time. That explains why a grant should never be a substitute for a working revenue engine.

How Startups Can Ensure Real, Sustainable Growth

It is possible for entrepreneurs to build startups that survive long past their initial launch phase. And this requires both support institutions and business owners to recalibrate how capital is deployed and measured.

A good way to go about this is in re-centering metrics around commercial progress. It is high time for support programs to measure customer retention, unit economics, gross margins, and willingness-to-pay experiments.

Of course, it doesn’t end at that. Startups should take it upon themselves to adopt milestone-based capital deployment. You can always decide to release capital in tiers to real-world commercial milestones. A good example of this is in securing the first ten playing clients or reaching a specific recurring monthly revenue target.

In conclusion, never should you measure the health of an entrepreneurial ecosystem with how many grants are handed out. Ensue you focus on the numbers of those businesses still in operation. They should also be hiring and generating profit in the next five years.

It is quite evident that grant money has the potential to launch an enterprise. But only paying customers can sustain it. The future of startup growth is in using non-dilutive funding. In short, you should never have grants as a permanent lifeline. Instead, it needs to serve as a temporary bridge to genuine market independence.